The Coherency Manifesto: Towards Communal Data Platforms
August 21, 2021 § 2 Comments
Version 1.0: Sep 11, 2021 (Interdependence Day)
As a community
who produces, consumes, and manages data
we hold these truths to be self-evident:
- Our most precious resource as a community is our ability to make better decisions together (“Coherency“)
- Better decisions are enabled by higher Quality Data
- Coherency increases as our Communal Data Platform aligns the Syntax of producers with the Semantics of consumers (“The Datocrat’s Conundrum“)
- Rational Trust in decision-makers is enabled by immutable public histories of past decisions and context (“Datasets”) plus transparency of the decision-making process over time (“Analyses”)
- A decision-maker’s Values are best seen in the datasets and analyses they Collect, Retain, Use, Share, Ignore, and Learn from (“The CRUSIL Conjecture“)
- Our coherency is constrained by how fast our communal data platform can adapt to new realities
- Forking Culture enables us to simultaneously pursue both adaptation and coherency
- The platform Architecture must be built on open source, standards & interfaces so we control our own evolution
- Service Providers may be used to provide well-defined components and innovative endpoints, where they won’t constrain the overall architecture
- We will never do this perfectly, but the better we understand and document our decisions, learnings and failures, the more rapidly the next generation can improve on them
Definitions
- Architecture: the fundamental concepts, contracts, and technologies that determine what is possible, feasible, and imaginable
- Analysis: The filters, features, priorities, and agencies used to make a decision in a particular context
- Coherency: How effectively an entity can harmonize the diverse perspectives of its constituents
- Communal Data Platform: An ecosystem of people, pipelines, and policies designed to provide us with continually better data
- Dataset: a versioned snapshot of the data and metadata used to make or validate a decision
- Forking Culture: using branches and pull requests to enable experimental customizations that may become maintream innovations
- Quality Data: (timely | accurate) + (comprehensive | digestible)
- Rational Trust: using all available information to estimate the ability of an entity to keep its promises, relative to our values and expectations about the future
- Service Provider: any durable entity that promises to add value in exchange for, eg, money, data, or attention
- Syntax: formal specifications of behavior, such as those used by a computer
- Semantics: the underlying meaning we care about, as experienced by humans
- Values: the tradeoffs we are willing to make when faced with hard decisions
References
- The CRUSIL Conjecture (Twitter)
- The Datocrat’s Conundrum (Twitter)
- Too Earnest: Two Ernest’s Forking Humanity (Podcast)
- DRAFT: The Coherency Manifesto (Google Doc)
- Datocracy: The Coherency Manifesto, Draft 1 (YouTube)
- Ground Rules of Civil Society: A Radical Centrist Manifesto (RadicalCentrism.org)
- RTFM: The Radical Transparency Manifesto (RadicalCentrism.org)
- The Swanifesto (The Swan Factory, Inc.)
[…] The Coherency Manifesto: Towards Communal Data Platforms […]
[…] Discipline went by many names: Datocracy. Mastery Transcript. The Fishbowl. Big Brother. Basically, it amounted to a complete and total lack […]