Leibniz on Agency: Contra Einstein and Newton on Non-Deterministic Causation

Sequel to When Leibniz Met Einstein: Causation as the Fundamental Conserved Quantity

Setting: A quiet study with three great minds seated at a table: Leibniz, ever philosophical and intrigued by the metaphysical implications of science; Einstein, wrestling with his discomfort around quantum uncertainty; and Newton, grounded in classical mechanics but open to new ideas. Leibniz begins.


Leibniz: A Prelude to Agency

Leibniz: My friends, I thank you for entertaining this thought experiment. Let us set aside, for a moment, the comforting rigidity of determinism. Instead, I propose that the universe is not a machine driven solely by fixed laws but a tapestry woven of agency—an interplay of causes that act non-deterministically, yet with purpose.


Newton: Skepticism of Non-Determinism

Newton: Agency, you say? It sounds to me like a return to a mysticism I worked so hard to dispel. How can a principle without certainty—or predictability—be the foundation of the cosmos?

Leibniz: Ah, Sir Isaac, do not mistake non-determinism for chaos. Agency operates not by randomness alone but by a principle I call sufficient reason, adapted for the quantum realm. Each event unfolds through causal entanglement, but not in a way that is strictly predetermined. Rather, causation “chooses” paths, guided by a deeper logic of potentialities.


Einstein: Uncomfortable with Quantum Uncertainty

Einstein: And yet, Gottfried, what you call “choosing paths” disturbs me. If quantum theory teaches us anything, it is that outcomes arise probabilistically, through mechanisms we cannot fully grasp. How can such uncertainty form the backbone of the universe? Where is the order I see in the field equations of general relativity?

Leibniz: Albert, your equations show us the harmony of what emerges, but not necessarily of what underpins it. Consider this: agency is not disorder but the capacity of the universe to “explore” its own potential. Quantum uncertainty is merely a reflection of a deeper, living causal fabric—one that, when viewed macroscopically, yields the deterministic patterns you so admire.


Newton: The Role of Causation

Newton: This is a curious suggestion, Leibniz. Are you saying that causation itself is not fixed, but somehow alive? That it might adapt or respond in ways beyond the laws I have so carefully codified?

Leibniz: Precisely. The mechanistic laws you derived, Sir Isaac, are emergent—they describe regularities in how agency operates over large scales. But at the quantum level, causation is flexible. It allows for non-deterministic entanglement, where outcomes are not fixed but influenced by the context of other causes.


Einstein: Entanglement and the Interconnected Universe

Einstein: You speak of entanglement as if it were a kind of communication—a causal link that operates beyond space and time. I cannot deny the experimental evidence, though it pains me to accept it. Yet, how can such a principle give rise to the geometry of space-time itself?

Leibniz: Think of agency as the weaver and entanglement as the threads. The act of causation ties events together, creating a web of relationships that gives space-time its structure. Einstein, your own work suggests that space-time is dynamic, shaped by mass-energy. I propose that both arise from the deeper dance of agency—causation entangling itself, non-deterministically, to create the very fabric of the cosmos.


Newton: Implications for Determinism

Newton: If I were to accept your premise, Leibniz, what of determinism? Are my laws of motion merely approximations of this deeper causality you describe?

Leibniz: Not approximations, my friend, but emergent truths. Determinism holds at macroscopic scales because the web of agency becomes tightly woven. The entanglement of causes averages out to produce the predictability you observed. But peel back the layers, and you find freedom—causation unbound, exploring paths not determined but possible.


Einstein: Agency as a Principle of the Universe

Einstein: I find your notion intriguing, though it remains speculative. If causation operates non-deterministically, does it not reduce the universe to chance?

Leibniz: Not chance, but choice. Agency is the principle that allows the universe to create itself moment by moment, selecting among potentialities. This principle is encoded in the quantum state, where entanglement becomes the bridge between possibility and actuality. In this view, your beloved cosmos is both free and orderly, bound by laws but guided by deeper causative potentials.


Newton and Einstein: A Hesitant Accord

Newton: (Pauses, considering.) Your argument is compelling, Leibniz. If your agency aligns with sufficient reason, I might admit it could complement my laws, not overthrow them.

Einstein: (Reluctantly nods.) Though I remain cautious, I cannot ignore the elegance of your idea. Agency may indeed reconcile quantum uncertainty with the deterministic beauty of relativity. Still, much work remains before such a principle could be proven.


Leibniz: The Final Word

Leibniz: Gentlemen, our dialogue is not an end but a beginning. Let us imagine a universe where causation itself is alive—a quantum interplay of potentialities, entangled and evolving. From this foundation arises both the space-time you, Albert, have so beautifully described, and the laws you, Sir Isaac, have so meticulously uncovered. In this, I see harmony, not contradiction—a universe guided by agency, ever unfolding its own possibilities.

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑