A Language With No ‘=’: My Journey to Homoiconic C

came of age in the 1980s, as the C programming language and UNIX operating system were becoming the gold standard for "serious" computing. I was taught that: - Lisp reflects how computers **think** - C reflects how computers **work** - Shell scripts reflect how humans **write** I never questioned this split ....

The Sixth Loop: Ultimate Causation?

Brahman:
"You have seen how the loops of causation evolve, each encompassing new dimensions of reality. Now, I challenge you to identify what lies beyond Status—what is the Sixth Loop? Is it grounded in mind, consciousness, technology, or something even more profound?"

The Fifth Loop of Universal Causation: Status

Athena: Humanity has mastered the physical, thrived biologically, developed language to shape meaning, and built narratives to create purpose. But beneath it all lies a more primal force: Status. Is this the hidden engine of causation, organizing hierarchies, influencing behavior, and even steering entire civilizations? Let’s discuss.

TSM-10.1: HLIR – Homoiconic, High-Level Intermediate Representation

instructions in a homoiconic form. It represents a novel synthesis in compiler design by bridging the gap between human and machine representations of programs. By combining monadic composition with homoiconic structure, HLIR allows developers to express computational intent with minimal syntax while maintaining direct mappings to MLIR's powerful optimization framework. This marriage of high-level semantics with low-level compilation produces a uniquely ergonomic intermediate representation - one where code is data, transformations are first-class citizens, and optimization becomes natural rather than imposed. The result is a language that is both easy for humans to reason about and efficient for compilers to transform, potentially setting a new standard for intermediate representations in modern compiler design.

TSM-9: Turing’s Actual Machine Makes the Case for Shannon Machines

In a sense, the Bombe makes the case for Shannon Machines by showing how computation in the real world is defined by constraints—bounded memory, time-sensitive tasks, cooperative components, and structured data access. Turing’s actual machine, the Bombe, reminds us that effective computation is often about meeting specific needs within specific limits. Rather than the theoretical purity of infinite tape, Turing’s Bombe—and by extension, Shannon Machines and Golden Girls Architecture—illustrate how real computation can be collaborative, memory-centric, and bounded by design.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑