AIGORA Design Sprint Kickoff: “Consigliere”

Briefed in the Voice of Jony Ive, Focused on Trust Reification

ChatGPT Prompt

1.0 🎯 The Essence

“We are not designing an interface. We are revealing a person’s lived network of trust.”

Consigliere is not here to guess.
It does not infer who you are.
It reflects what you’ve already entrusted.

It listens to your past choices—then helps you live them forward.

This is not predictive design.
This is relational recall—turned into responsible action.


2.0 🔍 What We’re Actually Building

We are designing a Trust Mirror
a system that observes, reifies, and refines the patterns of delegation, loyalty, caution, and conviction that already define the user’s digital life.

Think of it as:

  • A ledger of trust relationships: what services, people, agents the user already interacts with—and how.
  • A semantic map of intent: not just what they allow, but why—privacy, loyalty, utility, alignment.
  • A refactor engine: helping users refine their choices over time, not abandon them for defaults.

3.0 🧠 The User Experience

“It should feel like rediscovering the principles you’ve already been living by.”

3.1 Trust Archeology

When the user first interacts, the Consigliere does not ask for settings.
It studies the user’s ecosystem: accounts, app connections, behavior, data flows—
and builds a living, inspectable trust graph.

  • “You’ve already trusted these platforms with location data.”
  • “You tend to say yes to tools that offer transparency, and no to ads.”
  • “This app broke your trust last month. Do you want to review it?”

3.2 Visual Trust Ledger

Design a calm, inspectable interface where users can see:

  • Who they’ve granted access to (and in what context)
  • What values or goals those choices reflect
  • Where there are contradictions, decay, or unexamined delegation

Think: blockchain meets moral autobiography.

3.3 Active Reconciliation

The system doesn’t just reflect trust—it refines it:

  • “You gave location access for convenience, but you also value privacy. Want to limit this?”
  • “This agent has changed its behavior. Still aligned?”
  • “You trust this app because Tim recommended it. Do you want to expand that trust to other tools from him?”

4.0 🎨 Design Tone

  • Not diagnostic. Not paternal.
    It doesn’t tell the user what to do.
    It shows them what they already believe—more clearly.
  • Curatorial, not corrective.
    It helps you prune and polish your trust like a bonsai, not bulldoze it.
  • Warm, grounded, intelligent.
    Visuals should evoke confidence, not control.

5.0 Questions to Design Around

  • What does reified trust feel like?
  • How can trust maps be useful, not overwhelming?
  • How do we show the why behind trust—not just the what?
  • How can users train their Consigliere by living, not by configuring?

6.0 Success Criteria

  • Users say: “That’s exactly how I think about this.”
  • Users feel seen and respected, not guided or gamed.
  • Delegation becomes more intentional over time.
  • Trust becomes a design surface, not a buried assumption.

7.0 Final Words

“This is not about building something smart. It is about building something faithful.”

Let’s craft a system that dignifies trust—not as data,
but as the very fabric of agency in the age of AI.

Addendum: “Come for the tool, stay for the network”

— On How Consiglieres Grow Smarter When Your Friends Have One


1.0 Core Insight

“Trust is not an individual asset. It is a shared medium.”

Consigliere isn’t just your personal agent.
It becomes exponentially more powerful when your friends, communities, and networks also use it—because trust, by nature, is relational.

The network of Consiglieres forms a federation of aligned intent—each agent independently sovereign, yet socially intelligent.


2.0 Why This Matters

In today’s ecosystem:

  • Platforms optimize for individual clicks, not relational coherence.
  • Users face fragmented trust, constant friction, and asymmetric data leverage.

With Consigliere:

  • Trust signals are composable: if you trust someone, and they trust a service, that trust can be contextually inherited or questioned.
  • You no longer have to start from scratch.
    You begin with a web of curated, living trust.

3.0 UX Impact: What This Enables

3.1 Trust-Aware Recommendations

  • “3 of your trusted contacts already vetted this financial app for transparency.”
  • “This news source aligns with both your values and your reading circle’s habits.”

3.2 Delegated Judgment

  • “You often defer to Alice in tech tools. She recently revoked access to this one—want to review?”

3.3 Emergent Collective Wisdom

  • Anonymous, opt-in patterns across the network allow for:
  • Early detection of trust breaches
  • Elevation of values-aligned services
  • Collaborative filtering based not on behavior, but beliefs

4.0 Network Effects, Reimagined

Traditional network effects benefit the platform.
Consigliere’s network effects benefit the person.

Each new user improves:

  • The fidelity of value modeling
  • The nuance of negotiation defaults
  • The safety net for evaluating new agents or actors

The system gets smarter, not by aggregating your data,
but by interlinking your trust.


5.0 Quote

“A single conscience is powerful. A network of conscience is unstoppable.”
AIGORA Design Memo


6.0 Strategic Invitation

So yes—come for the autonomy.
But stay for the collective insight that only emerges
when trust is treated as a shared, living organism.

Let your Consigliere meet mine.

Let them help us build a future worth trusting.

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑